| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
310MC Presentation Notes 11/12/08
Spectacle Research
- ‘United Colors of Benetton’ Olivero Toscani
- Detournement
- ‘Society of the Spectacle’ Guy Debord
- Advertising
- ‘Male Gaze’ Laura Mulvey
- Gender
- ‘1984′ George Orwell
- ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ Margret Atwood
- ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ Stanley Kubrick
Spectacle Artefact
- Idea
- Poor photography
- Needed to be more prepared
- Develop into original image
- Research into Photoshop
- Create set out of studio
Power Research
- ‘The Economy of Power’ Michael Foucault
- ‘Dogme 95′ Lars Von Trier & Jorgen Leth
- ‘The Fourth Estate’ Jeffrey Archer
- ‘Ways of Seeing’ John Berger
- ‘1984′ George Orwell
- ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ Margret Atwood
- Psychogeography
Power Artefact
- Struggled with idea
- Wanted to shoot last photo
- New positions – 3 ‘monkeys’ together, Profiles & CU
- Research into vivid film for development
Memory Research
- ‘False Memory Syndrome’ Sigmund Freud
- ‘Being John Malcovich’ Spike Jonze
- ‘1984′ George Orwell
- ‘Dreamcatcher’ Laurence Kasdan
- ‘Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind’ Michel Gondry
- ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ Margret Atwood
- ‘A Beautiful Mind’ Ron Howard
Memory Artefact
- Struggled with how to express memory, pleased with final idea
- Poor photography and lighting
- Made props, would alter for development
- Create exhibition of walk-in brain
- Chosen developing artefact
1 Comment »
{ RSS feed for comments on this post} · { TrackBack URI }
stiggy42 Said:
on February 11, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Presentation feedback from Karen:
“Your presentation was well thought through with good references to a range of media practitioners – some direct quotes or examples would have improved this. You also included your reflections well.
You are on the right lines for doing well at this module – you have some good ideas which have some serious theoretical underpinnings. Some more time and effort could lift you to a 1st.
60-69% high 2:1″